Immunogenic compositions having low sodium chloride concentration

ABSTRACT

Immunogenic compositions comprising an antigen, wherein the concentration of sodium chloride or the ionic strength of the composition is less than 100 mM, and their use in medicine, are provided.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to immunogenic compositions comprising a protein antigen and having sodium chloride concentrations at or below 100 mM. The present invention also relates to such immunogenic compositions comprising an antigen or antigen preparation, and further comprising one or more immunostimulants.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The formulation of protein antigens is extremely important in order to ensure the immunogenicity is maintained. Immunostimulants are sometimes used to improve the immune response raised to any given antigen. However the inclusion of adjuvants into a vaccine or immunogenic composition increases the complexity of preparation of the components as well as the complexity of distribution and formulation of the vaccine composition. The preparation of each of the adjuvant components as well as the antigenic component must be considered by formulators. In particular, the compatibility of the antigenic component with the adjuvant component should be considered. This is particularly the case where lyophilised antigens or antigenic preparations are intended to be reconstituted with an adjuvant preparation. In such a circumstance, it is important that the buffer of the adjuvant preparation is suitable for the antigen or antigenic preparation and that immunogenicity or solubility of the antigen is not affected by the adjuvant.

The protein antigens PRAME and NY-ESO-1 (described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,830,753 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,804,381, respectively) or fragments or derivatives thereof are protein antigens of potential benefit for the treatment of cancer.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present inventors have found that some antigens such as PRAME and NY-ESO-1 are particularly sensitive to a phenomenon known as “salting out” which may be defined as the precipitation of a protein from its solution by saturation with a salt such as sodium chloride. The present inventors have found that these antigens aggregate and precipitate at a concentration of sodium chloride as low as 150 mM.

Accordingly, in one embodiment the antigen or antigenic preparation is any antigen which precipitates, coagulates or aggregates after being dissolved in a solution comprising a concentration of sodium chloride (NaCl) or with an ionic strength greater than 5 mM, 10 mM, 15 mM, 20 mM, 30 mM, 40 mM, 50 mM, 60 mM, 70 mM, 80 mM, 90 mM or 100 mM.

The present invention provides an immunogenic composition comprising PRAME or NY-ESO-1, wherein the concentration of sodium chloride in said composition is less than 100 mM.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1. QS21 lytic activity curve.

FIG. 2. Percentage of each 3D-MPL congener in the different ASA formulations.

FIG. 3. Freeze-drying cycle used for lyophilisation of PRAME/CpG.

FIG. 4. A pictorial comparison between PRAME and NYESO-1 reconstituted in ASA (150 mM NaCl) and ASA (sorbitol).

FIG. 5. Humoral response of mice immunised with PRAME/CpG formulated with differing adjuvant compositions in Experiment 1.

FIG. 6. Tumor protection in mice immunised with PRAME/CpG formulated with differing adjuvant compositions in Experiment 1.

FIG. 7. Humoral response of mice immunised with PRAME/CpG formulated with ASA (150 mM NaCl), ASA (sorbitol) or liquid formulation ASA in Experiment 2.

FIG. 8. CD4+ response of mice immunised with PRAME/CpG formulated with ASA (150 mM NaCl), ASA (sorbitol) or liquid formulation ASA in Experiment 2.

FIG. 9. Tumor protection in mice immunised with PRAME/CpG formulated with ASA (150 mM NaCl), ASA (sorbitol) or liquid formulation ASA in Experiment 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides an immunogenic composition comprising an antigen as described herein, wherein the concentration of sodium chloride is less than 100 mM. In particular, the present invention provides immunogenic compositions comprising an antigen, wherein the concentration of sodium chloride is below about 100 mM, for example below about 90 mM, 80 mM, 70 mM, 60 mM, 50 mM, 40 mM, 30 mM, 20 mM or 15 mM. In a particular embodiment the concentration of sodium chloride in the immunogenic composition is below 10 mM or is at or below 5 mM. In a further specific embodiment, the immunogenic composition is essentially free of sodium chloride. By essentially free is meant that the concentration of sodium chloride is at or very near to zero mM.

The skilled person can readily test for the concentration of both sodium (Na⁺) and chloride (Cl⁻) ions using known techniques and kits. For example, sodium can be determined using a kit such as the Sodium Enzymatic Assay Kit (Catalog Number: BQ011EAEL) from Biosupply. Chloride can be determined using a kit such as Chloride Enzymatic Assay Kit (Catalog Number: BQ006EAEL) from Biosupply.

In a further embodiment of the invention, there is provided an immunogenic composition comprising an antigen as described herein, wherein the ionic strength is less than 100 mM, for example below 90 mM, 80 mM, 70 mM, 60 mM, 50 mM, 40 mM, 30 mM, 20 mM or 15 mM. In a particular embodiment the ionic strength in the immunogenic composition is below 10 mM or is at or below 5 mM. In a further specific embodiment, the immunogenic composition has an ionic strength that is at or very near to zero mM (i.e., 1, 2, 3 mM).

The ionic strength of the an adjuvant or immunogenic composition of the invention can be measured using techniques known the skilled person, for example using a conductivity meter.

Accordingly, in one embodiment the antigen or antigenic preparation is any antigen which precipitates, coagulates or aggregates after being dissolved in a solution comprising a concentration of sodium chloride (NaCl) or wherein the ionic strength of the solution is greater than 5 mM, 10 mM, 15 mM, 20 mM, 30 mM, 40 mM, 50 mM, 60 mM, 70 mM, 80 mM, 90 mM or 100 mM. The person skilled in the art can determine whether an antigen meets this definition by dissolving and/or mixing an antigen in such a solution. An antigen which does not meet this definition will still be in solution, i.e. the liquid will still be clear with no precipitation, 24 hours after being dissolved and/or mixed. An antigen which precipitates, coagulates or aggregates after being dissolved in a solution comprising a concentration of sodium chloride of 100 mM is one which, after 24 hours or less, can be seen to be precipitating by the cloudiness of the solution. In addition, aggregation that is not detectable visually may be observed using methods known to the skilled person which include, but are not limited to SEC-HPLC.

In one embodiment, there is provided an immunogenic composition comprising an antigen, wherein the concentration of sodium chloride is less than 100 mM for example below about 90 mM, 80 mM, 70 mM, 60 mM, 50 mM, 40 mM, 30 mM, 20 mM, 15 mM, 10 or 5 mM and wherein the antigen is PRAME (also known as DAGE) or fragment or derivative thereof.

In a further embodiment of the invention, there is provided an immunogenic composition comprising an antigen, wherein the ionic strength of said composition is less than 100 mM, for example below 90 mM, 80 mM, 70 mM, 60 mM, 50 mM, 40 mM, 30 mM, 20 mM or 15 mM and wherein the antigen is PRAME (also known as DAGE) or fragment or derivative thereof. In a particular embodiment the ionic strength in the immunogenic composition is below 10 mM or is at or below 5 mM, and wherein the antigen is PRAME or fragment or derivative thereof.

The antigen and its preparation are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,830,753. PRAME is found in the Annotated Human Gene Database H-Inv DB under the accession numbers: U65011.1, BC022008.1, AK129783.1, BC014974.2, CR608334.1, AF025440.1, CR591755.1, BC039731.1, CR623010.1, CR611321.1, CR618501.1, CR604772.1, CR456549.1, and CR620272.1.

Fusion proteins that comprise the PRAME antigen may also be used. PRAME or a fragment or derivative thereof may be employed, optionally in the form of a fusion protein with a heterologous fusion partner. In particular, PRAME antigen may suitably be employed in the form of a fusion protein with Haemophilus influenzae B protein D or a portion thereof or derivative thereof. The portion of protein D that may be employed suitably does not include the secretion sequence or signal sequence. Suitably the fusion partner protein comprises amino acids Met-Asp-Pro at or within the N-terminus of the fusion protein sequence and in which the fusion partner protein does not include the secretion sequence or the signal sequence of protein D. For example the fusion partner protein may comprise or consist of approximately or exactly amino acids 17 to 127, 18 to 127, 19 to 127 or 20 to 127 of protein D. Suitable PRAME antigens based on fusions proteins with protein D are described in WO2008/087102 which document is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

In one embodiment, there is provided an immunogenic composition comprising an antigen, wherein the concentration of sodium chloride is less than 100 mM, for example below about 90 mM, 80 mM, 70 mM, 60 mM, 50 mM, 40 mM, 30 mM, 20 mM, 15 mM, 10 or 5 mM and wherein the antigen is NY-ESO-1 or a fragment or derivative thereof.

In a further embodiment of the invention, there is provided an immunogenic composition comprising an antigen, wherein the ionic strength of said compositions is less than 100 mM, for example below 90 mM, 80 mM, 70 mM, 60 mM, 50 mM, 40 mM, 30 mM, 20 mM or 15 mM and wherein the antigen is NY-ESO-1 or a fragment or derivative thereof. In a particular embodiment the ionic strength in the immunogenic composition is below 10 mM or is at or below 5 mM, and wherein the antigen is NY-ESO-1 or a fragment or derivative thereof.

NY-ESO-1 may be full length or a fragment or derivative thereof may be employed, optionally in the form of a fusion protein with a heterologous fusion partner. NY-ESO-1 is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,804,381, which document is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The protein NY-ESO-1 is approximately 180 amino acids in length and can be described as being composed of three regions: (a) an N-terminal region being about amino acids 1-70 (b) a central region being about amino acids 71-134 and (c) a C terminal region being about amino acids 135-180 NY-ESO-1 may be employed as a fusion protein for example as a fusion with LAGE-1 or a fragment thereof, see WO2008/089074 which document is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Where fragments of NY-ESO-1 are employed these suitably include one or more MHC Class 1 or Class 2 epitopes e.g. those known as A31, DR1, DR2, DR4, DR7, DP4, B35, B51, Cw3, Cw6 and A2 (see WO2008/089074).

Although not sensitive to NaCl as such, a further antigen that may be employed in accordance with the present invention is a MAGE antigen, e.g. of the MAGE-3 family such as MAGE-A3. MAGE-3 antigens have, for example, been described as suitable to be formulated in combination with NY-ESO-1—see WO2005/105139, which document is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

MAGE antigens such as MAGE-A3 may be used as such or in the form of a derivative e.g. a chemically modified derivative and/or in the form of a fusion protein with a heterologous fusion partner. For example the MAGE antigen may contain reduced disulphide bridges to form free thiols which have been derivatised, e.g. with carboxamide or carboxymethyl groups, see WO99/40188 which document is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In particular, MAGE antigens may suitably be employed in the form of a fusion protein with Haemophilus influenzae B protein D or a portion thereof or derivative thereof. For example approximately the first third of protein D or the N-terminal 100 to 110 amino acids of protein D may be employed as the fusion partner, see WO99/40188.

In a further embodiment, the antigen or antigenic composition may be a derivative of any of the antigens described herein. As used herein the term “derivative” refers to an antigen that is modified relative to its naturally occurring form. Derivatives of the present invention are sufficiently similar to native antigens to retain antigenic properties and remain capable of allowing an immune response to be raised against the native antigen. Whether or not a given derivative raises such an immune response may be measured by a suitable immunological assay such as an ELISA or flow cytometry.

The term “fragment” as used herein refers to fragments of a tumour associated antigen or derivative of the antigen which contain at least one epitope, for example a CTL epitope, typically a peptide of at least 8 amino acids. Fragments of at least 8, for example 8-10 amino acids or up to 20, 50, 60, 70, 100, 150 or 200 amino acids in length are considered to fall within the scope of the invention as long as the fragment demonstrates antigen icity, that is to say that the major epitopes (e.g., CTL epitopes) are retained by the fragment and the fragment is capable of inducing an immune response that cross-reacts with the naturally occurring tumour associated antigen. Exemplary fragments may be 8 to 10, to 20, 20 to 50, 50 to 60, 60 to 70, 70 to 100, 100 to 150, 150 to 200 amino acid residues in length (inclusive of any value within these ranges).

The immunogenic compositions may comprise one or more further antigens.

It is well known that for parenteral administration solutions should be physiologically isotonic (i.e. have a pharmaceutically acceptable osmolality) to avoid cell distortion or lysis. An “isotonicity agent” is a compound that is physiologically tolerated and imparts a suitable tonicity to a formulation (e.g. immunogenic compositions of the invention) to prevent the net flow of water across cell membranes that are in contact with the formulation.

Generally, sodium chloride (NaCl) is used as an isotonicity agent. The present inventors have shown that that certain antigens are particularly sensitive to “salting out”, a process whereby proteins in solution aggregate or coagulate when in solutions containing high concentrations of salt, alternative means for making the immunogenic compositions of the invention as described herein isotonic.

In a particular embodiment there is provided immunogenic compositions further comprising a non-ionic isotonicity agent. A suitable non-ionic isotonicity agent for use in an immunogenic composition will need to be suitable for use in humans, as well as being compatible with the antigens within the antigenic composition and further compatible with other components such an the immunostimulant(s).

In one embodiment of the present invention, suitable non-ionic isotonicity agents are polyols, sugars (in particular sucrose, fructose, dextrose or glucose) or amino acids such as glycine. In one embodiment the polyol is a sugar alcohol especially a C3-6 sugar alcohol. Exemplary sugar alcohols include glycerol, erythritol, threitol, arabitol, xylitol, ribitol, sorbitol, mannitol, dulcitol and iditol. In a specific example of this embodiment, a suitable non-ionic isotonicity agent is sorbitol. In a particular embodiment of the invention the non-ionic isotonicity agent in the compositions of the invention is sucrose and/or sorbitol.

In one embodiment, a suitable concentration of polyol within the immunogenic composition is between about 3 and about 15% (w/v), in particular between about 3 and about 10% (w/v) for example between about 3 and about 7% (w/v), for example between about 4 and about 6% (w/v). In a specific example of this embodiment, the polyol is sorbitol.

In a particular embodiment of the invention, the immunogenic composition comprises one or more immunostimulants.

In one embodiment, this immunostimulant may be a saponin. A particularly suitable saponin for use in the present invention is Quil A and its derivatives. Quil A is a saponin preparation isolated from the South American tree Quillaja Saponaria Molina and was first described by Dalsgaard et al. in 1974 (“Saponin adjuvants”, Archiv. für die gesamte Virusforschung, Vol. 44, Springer Verlag, Berlin, p243-254) to have adjuvant activity. Purified fragments of Quil A have been isolated by HPLC which retain adjuvant activity without the toxicity associated with Quil A (EP 0 362 278), for example QS7 and QS21 (also known as QA7 and QA21). QS-21 is a natural saponin derived from the bark of Quillaja saponaria Molina, which induces CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (CTLs), Th1 cells and a predominant IgG2a antibody response. QS21 is a preferred saponin in the context of the present invention.

In a suitable form of the present invention, the saponin adjuvant within the immunogenic composition is a derivative of saponaria molina quil A, preferably an immunologically active fraction of Quil A, such as QS-17 or QS-21, suitably QS-21.

In a specific embodiment, QS21 is provided in its less reactogenic composition where it is quenched with an exogenous sterol, such as cholesterol for example. Several particular forms of less reactogenic compositions wherein QS21 is quenched with an exogenous cholesterol exist. In a specific embodiment, the saponin/sterol is in the form of a liposome structure (WO 96/33739, Example 1). In this embodiment the liposomes suitably contain a neutral lipid, for example phosphatidylcholine, which is suitably non-crystalline at room temperature, for example eggyolk phosphatidylcholine, dioleoyl phosphatidylcholine (DOPC) or dilauryl phosphatidylcholine. The liposomes may also contain a charged lipid which increases the stability of the lipsome-QS21 structure for liposomes composed of saturated lipids. In these cases the amount of charged lipid is suitably 1-20% w/w, preferably 5-10%. The ratio of sterol to phospholipid is 1-50% (mol/mol), suitably 20-25%.

Suitable sterols include β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, ergosterol, ergocalciferol and cholesterol. In one particular embodiment, the immunogenic composition comprises cholesterol as sterol. These sterols are well known in the art, for example cholesterol is disclosed in the Merck Index, 11th Edn., page 341, as a naturally occurring sterol found in animal fat.

Where the active saponin fraction is QS21, the ratio of QS21:sterol will typically be in the order of 1:100 to 1:1 (w/w), suitably between 1:10 to 1:1 (w/w), and preferably 1:5 to 1:1 (w/w). Suitably excess sterol is present, the ratio of QS21:sterol being at least 1:2 (w/w). In one embodiment, the ratio of QS21:sterol is 1:5 (w/w). The sterol is suitably cholesterol.

In another embodiment, the immunogenic composition comprises an immunostimulant which is a Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist. By “TLR agonist” it is meant a component which is capable of causing a signalling response through a TLR signalling pathway, either as a direct ligand or indirectly through generation of endogenous or exogenous ligand (Sabroe et al., JI 2003 p 1630-5). A TLR4 agonist is capable of causing a signally response through a TLR-4 signalling pathway. A suitable example of a TLR4 agonist is a lipopolysaccharide, suitably a non-toxic derivative of lipid A, particularly monophosphoryl lipid A or more particularly 3-Deacylated monophoshoryl lipid A (3D-MPL).

3D-MPL is sold under the name MPL by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals N.A. and is referred throughout the document as MPL or 3D-MPL. see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,436,727; 4,877,611; 4,866,034 and 4,912,094. 3D-MPL primarily promotes CD4+ T cell responses with an IFN-g (Th1) phenotype. 3D-MPL can be produced according to the methods disclosed in GB 2 220 211 A. Chemically it is a mixture of 3-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A with 3, 4, 5 or 6 acylated chains. In the compositions of the present invention small particle 3D-MPL my be used to prepare the immunogenic composition. Small particle 3D-MPL has a particle size such that it may be sterile-filtered through a 0.22 μm filter. Such preparations are described in WO 94/21292. Preferably, powdered 3D-MPL is used to prepare the immunogenic compositions of the present invention.

Other TLR4 agonists which can be used are alkyl Glucosaminide phosphates (AGPs) such as those disclosed in WO98/50399 or U.S. Pat. No. 6,303,347 (processes for preparation of AGPs are also disclosed), suitably RC527 or RC529 or pharmaceutically acceptable salts of AGPs as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,764,840. Some AGPs are TLR4 agonists, and some are TLR4 antagonists. Both are thought to be useful as immunostimulants.

Other suitable TLR-4 agonists are as described in WO2003/011223 and in WO 2003/099195, such as compound I, compound II and compound III disclosed on pages 4-5 of WO2003/011223 or on pages 3-4 of WO2003/099195 and in particular those compounds disclosed in WO2003/011223 as ER803022, ER803058, ER803732, ER804053, ER804057m ER804058, ER804059, ER804442, ER804680 and ER804764, For example, one suitable TLR-4 agonist is ER804057.

In a particular embodiment, the immunogenic composition comprises both saponin and a TLR4 agonist. In a specific example, the immunogenic composition comprises QS21 and 3D-MPL.

A TLR-4 agonist such as a lipopolysaccharide, such as 3D-MPL, can be used at amounts between 1 and 100 μg per human dose of the immunogenic composition. 3D-MPL may be used at a level of about 50 μg, for example between 40 to 60 μg, suitably between 45 to 55 μg or between 49 and 51 μg or 50 μg. In a further embodiment, the human dose of the immunogenic composition comprises 3D-MPL at a level of about 25 μg, for example between 20 to 30 μg, suitable between 21 to 29 μg or between 22 to 28 μg or between 28 and 27 μg or between 24 and 26 μg, or 25 μg.

A saponin, such as QS21, can be used at amounts between 1 and 100 μg per human dose of the immunogenic composition. QS21 may be used at a level of about 50 μg, for example between 40-60 μg, suitably between 45 to 55 μg or between 49 and 51 μg or 50 μg. In a further embodiment, the human dose of the immunogenic composition comprises QS21 at a level of about 25 μg, for example between 20 to 30 μg, suitable between 21 to 29 μg or between 22 to 28 μg or between 28 and 27 μg or between 24 and 26 μg, or 25 μg.

Where both TLR4 agonist and saponin are present in the immunogenic composition, then the weight ratio of TLR4 agonist to saponin is suitably between 1:5 to 5:1, suitably 1:1. For example, where 3D-MPL is present at an amount of 50 μg or 25 μg, then suitably QS21 may also be present at an amount of 50 μg or 25 μg, respectively, per human dose of the immunogenic composition.

In one embodiment, the immunostimulant is a TLR9 agonist, for example as set out in WO 2008/142133. In a specific example, said TLR9 agonist is an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide, in particular an oligonucleotide containing an unmethylated CpG motif. Such oligonucleotides are well known and are described, for example, in WO 96/02555, WO 99/33488 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,462. Suitable TLR9 agonists for use in the immunogenic compositions described herein are CpG containing oligonucleotides, optionally containing two or more dinucleotide CpG motifs separated by at least three, suitably at least six or more nucleotides. A CpG motif is a cytosine nucleotide followed by a Guanine nucleotide.

In one embodiment the internucleotide bond in the oligonucleotide is phosphorodithioate, or possibly a phosphorothioate bond, although phosphodiester and other internucleotide bonds could also be used, including oligonucleotides with mixed internucleotide linkages. Methods for producing phosphorothioate oligonucleotides or phosphorodithioate are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,666,153, U.S. Pat. No. 5,278,302 and WO95/26204. Oligonucleotide comprising different internucleotide linkages are contemplated, e.g. mixed phosphorothioate phophodiesters. Other internucleotide bonds which stabilise the oligonucleotide may be used.

Examples of CpG oligonucleotides suitable for inclusion in the immunogenic compositions described herein have the following sequences. In one embodiment, these sequences contain phosphorothioate modified internucleotide linkages.

OLIGO 1 (SEQ ID NO: 1): TCC ATG ACG TTC CTG ACG TT (CpG 1826) OLIGO 2 (SEQ ID NO: 2): TCT CCC AGC GTG CGC CAT (CpG 1758) OLIGO 3 (SEQ ID NO: 3): ACC GAT GAC GTC GCC GGT GAC GGC ACC ACG OLIGO 4 (SEQ ID NO: 4): TCG TCG TTT TGT CGT TTT GTC GTT (CpG 2006) OLIGO 5 (SEQ ID NO: 5): TCC ATG ACG TTC CTG ATG CT (CpG 1668)

Alternative CpG oligonucleotides may comprise the sequences above in that they have inconsequential deletions or additions thereto.

In one embodiment the immunostimulant is a tocol. Tocols are well known in the art and are described in EP0382271. In a particular embodiment, the tocol is alpha-tocopherol or a derivative thereof such as alpha-tocopherol succinate (also known as vitamin E succinate).

The present invention also provides for a process for making an immunogenic composition of the invention comprising the steps:

-   -   a. Lyophilising an antigen as described herein, optionally with         an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide as described herein; and     -   b. Resconstituting the lyophilised composition of step a) with         an aqueous adjuvant composition wherein the concentration of         NaCl or ionic strength of the aqueous adjuant composition is         less than 100 mM, 90 mM, 80 mM, 70 mM, 60 mM, 50 mM, 40 mM, 30         mM, 20 mM, 15 mM or 10 mM.

In a particular embodiment the lyophilised antigen is any antigen which precipitates, coagulates or aggregates after being dissolved in a solution comprising a concentration of sodium chloride or a solution with an ionic strength greater than 10 mM, 20 mM, 30 mM, 40 mM, 50 mM, 60 mM, 70 mM, 80 mM, 90 mM or 100 mM. In a further embodiment, the lyophilised antigen is selected from the group PRAME or NY-ESO-1.

In one embodiment the adjuvant composition of step b) (above) comprises a saponin and/or a TLR-4 agonist as described herein, for example QS21 and/or 3D-MPL. In a further embodiment the saponin and/or TLR4 agonist are in a liposomal formulation. In one embodiment, the adjuvant composition comprises a TLR4 agonist and a saponin in a liposomal formulation, and a non-ionic isotonicity agent as described herein. In particular the adjuvant composition of the present invention may comprise sorbitol.

In a further embodiment of the invention, there is provided a kit comprising:

-   -   a. a lyophilised antigen, optionally co-lyophilised with CpG;         and     -   b. an aqueous adjuvant composition wherein the concentration of         NaCl or ionic strength is less than 100 mM, 90 mM, 80 mM, 70 mM,         60 mM, 50 mM, 40 mM, 30 mM, 20 mM, 15 mM or 10 mM.

In a particular embodiment of the invention, the antigen ins the kits as described herein comprise either PRAME or NY-ESO-1 and their fragments and/or deriviatives.

In an alternative embodiment, there is a provided a kit wherein the CpG is not co-lyophilsed with the antigen. The CpG may be either mixed with the aqueous adjuvant composition, or be in a separate vial in aqueous or lyophilised form.

The aqueous adjuvants used in kits of the invention maybe any of the adjuvant compositions as defined herein. In a specific embodiment of the invention, the aqueous adjuvant composition comprises a TLR4 agonist and/or a saponin in the form of liposomes. In a particular embodiment, the TLR4 agonist is 3D-MPL and the saponin is QS21. The aqueous adjuvants used herein may comprise an isotoncity agent, for example a polyol, such a sorbitol.

The present invention further provides an immunogenic composition as described herein for use in the immunotherapeutic treatment of cancer.

In specific examples of this embodiment the invention provides an immunogenic composition as described herein for use in the immunotherapeutic treatment of one or more cancers selected from the group consisting of prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, pancreatic, renal, ovarian or melanoma cancers.

The present invention further provides a method of therapy or prophylaxis of cancer in an individual in need thereof comprising the step of providing said individual with an effective amount of an immunogenic composition as described herein.

In specific examples of this embodiment the invention provides a method of therapy or prophylaxis of a cancer selected from the group consisting of prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, pancreatic, renal, ovarian or melanoma cancers.

The present invention will now be further described by means of the following non-limiting examples.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Preparation of Adjuvant Composition ASA (Sorbitol)

An adjuvant composition was prepared which comprised 3-deacylated MPL and QS21 in a liposomal formulation. This was prepared as follows:

A. Method of Preparation of Liposomes:

A mixture of lipid (such as synthetic phosphatidylcholine), cholesterol and 3-O-deacylated MPL in organic solvent was dried down under vacuum. An aqueous solution (such as phosphate buffered saline [100 mM NaCl, 20 mM Phosphate pH 6.1]) was then added and the vessel agitated until all the lipid was in suspension. This suspension was then prehomogenized with high shear mixer and then high pressure homogenized until the liposomes size was reduced to around 90 nm+/−10 nm measured by DLS. Liposomes were then sterile filtered.

B. ASA Formulation: Step 1: Dilution of Concentrated Liposomes

Na₂/K Phosphate buffer 100 mM pH6.1 when diluted 10 times was added to water for injection to reach a 10 mM phosphate buffer concentration in the final formulation. A 30% (w/v) sorbitol solution in water for injection (WFI) was then added to reach a concentration of 4.7% in the final formulation—this was stirred for 15 to 45 minutes at room temperature.

Concentrated liposomes (made of DOPC, cholesterol and MPL at 40 mg/ml, 10 mg/ml and 2 mg/ml respectively) were then added to the mix to reach a concentration of 100 μg/ml of MPL in the final formulation.

The mixture was subsequently stirred for 15 to 45 minutes at room temperature.

Step 2: QS21 Addition

Using a peristaltic pump, QS21 bulk stock (thawed 24H at RT or 2 days at 4° C. for 200 ml) was added with a peristaltic pump at a rate of 200 ml/min to the diluted liposomes under magnetic stirring to reach a 100 μg/ml concentration in the final formulation. The mix was stirred for 15 to 45 minutes.

Final ASA formulation contained 100 μg MPL/ml and 100 μg QS21/ml.

Step 3: pH was Checked to be 6.1+/−0.3 Step 4: Sterile Filtration

Sterile filtration was realized at a constant rate of 400 ml/min on a polyethersulfone (PES) filter from PALL Corporation.

Step 5: Storage at +2° C. to +8° C.

The adjuvant composition was obtained, which comprised 3-O-deacylated MPL and QS21 in a liposomal formulation and containing sorbitol (designated ASA (sorbitol)), was then stored at 4° C.

Example 2 Preparation of Adjuvant Composition ASA (150 mM NaCl) A. Method of Preparation of Liposomes:

A mixture of lipid (such as synthetic phosphatidylcholine), cholesterol and 3-deacylated MPL (3D-MPL) in organic solvent was dried down under vacuum. phosphate buffered saline was then added and the vessel agitated until all the lipid is in suspension. This suspension WAs then prehomogenized with high shear mixer and then high pressure homogenized until the liposomes size was reduced to around 90 nm+/−10 nm measured by DLS. Liposomes were then sterile filtered on 0.22 μm PES membrane.

B. ASA Formulation: Step 1: Dilution of Concentrated Liposomes

Na₂/K Phosphate buffer 100 mM pH 6.45 when diluted 10 times and NaCl 1.5M were added to water for injection to reach respectively 10 mM phosphate and NaCl 150 mM concentrations in the final formulation. This mixture was stirred for 5 minutes at room temperature, Concentrated liposomes (made of DOPC, cholesterol and MPL at 40 mg/ml, 10 mg/ml and 2 mg/ml respectively) were then added to the mix to reach a concentration of 100 μg/ml of MPL in the final formulation. The mixture was subsequently stirred for 5 to 15 minutes at room temperature.

Step 2: QS21 Addition

QS21 bulk stock (thawed 24H at RT or 2 days at 4° C. for 200 ml) was added to the diluted liposomes under magnetic stirring to reach a 100 μg/ml concentration in the final formulation. The mix was stirred at RT.

Step 3: pH was Checked so as to be 6.1+/−0.1. Step 4: Sterile Filtration

Sterile filtration was realized on a polyethersulfone (PES) filter from PALL Corporation.

Step 5: Storage at +2° C. to +8° C.

Final composition of ASA was 2 mg DOPC, 500 μg cholesterol, 100 μg 3-O-deacylated MPL, 100 μg QS21 per 1 ml.

Example 3 QS21 Lytic Activity

QS21 is known to lyse red blood cells (RBC). The ASA (sorbitol) adjuvant composition prepared as in Example 1 was tested to ensure that QS21 lytic activity was quenched in the same way as was seen with the equivalent adjuvant composition comprising 150 mM NaCl (ASA (150 mM NaCl)).

QS21 lytic activity was measured by a haemolysis assay using chicken Red Blood cells (RBC). RBC were centrifuged at 550 g at 4° C. Supernatant was discarded. The pellet was carefully resuspended in PBS buffer to reach the initial volume and the same operation was repeated until supernatant was no longer red (generally 3 times). The pellet was stored at 4° C. for 3 to 4 days maximum if not used directly (and washed again the day it is used) or was diluted around 10 times in buffer if used the same day.

A QS21 dose range curve was prepared in ASA buffer (in salt or in sorbitol buffer following the ASA sample tested) extemporaneously and the adjuvant samples (containing a 50 μg or 90 μg equivalent of QS21 meaning the equivalent of 500 μl or 900 μl ASA) were prepared. Final volume was adjusted to 900 μl in standards and samples with adequate buffer (containing or not sorbitol as a function of the buffer of the sample tested). Due to its opalescence, ASA interferes in optical density (OD). ASA “blanks” were thus prepared and their OD was subtracted from the OD of ASA tested samples. Those blanks corresponded to the same ASA volume as the volume tested in samples, but adjusted to 1 ml with buffer. No RBC were added to these blanks. Standards and samples were then incubated with RBC (100 μl of diluted RBC added to 900 μl of standards and samples) for 30 minutes at room temperature (RT). Samples were then centrifuged 5 minutes at 900 g. Optical density at 540 nm was measured after centrifugation.

Determination of lytic activity was carried out by a limit test.

1. Limit of detection (LOD) was defined as the lowest concentration of QS21 leading to an OD:

-   -   Higher than the base level (OD>0.1)     -   Around three times higher than OD's buffer (the “o μg” QS21)     -   In the ascendant part of the curve     -   Determined for each test.

2. QS21 lytic activity was held to be positive in the adjuvant samples if the OD for the adjuvant sample was greater than the OD_(LOD).

Example of QS21 Curve:

ug QS21 OD QS21 quenched 0 0.029 NA 0.5 0.052 <LOD 0.6 0.073 <LOD 0.7 0.091 <LOD 0.8 0.096 <LOD 0.9 0.12 >98.2% 1 0.195  >98% 1.1 0.212 >97.8% 1.2 0.348 >97.6% 1.3 0.479 >97.4% 1.4 0.612 >97.2% 1.5 0.669  >97% 2 1.139  >96% 2.5 1.294  >95% 3 1.391  >94% 5 1.416  >90% Adjuvant * 0.03 >98.2% * 50 ug QS21 equivalent tested. 150 mM sodium chloride buffer.

The Limit of Detection in this assay is at 0.9 ug QS21, and OD of 0.12

The QS21 quenching in an adjuvant composition comprising 150 mM sodium chloride was estimated to be more than 98.2% for the equivalent of 50 μg QS21 tested. In the case of an equivalent of 90 μg tested, conclusion is more than 99%.

QS21 quenching was then compared with an equivalent adjuvant composition comprising sorbitol and only 5 mM sodium chloride. Data were generated after storage of the ASA at 4° C. or after accelerated stability (7 days at 37° C.). For the ASA in sorbitol, the QS21 standard curve was realized in a sorbitol containing buffer.

Sample Timepoint LOD QS21 quenched Adjuvant composition (ASA) T0 <1.4 >97.2% 150 mM NaCl 7 d 37° C. <0.9 >98.2% Adjuvant Composition (ASA) T0 <2 >97.8% sorbitol, 5 mM NaCl 7 D 37° C. <1  >96% 11 M 4° C. <2  >97.8%* Equivalent of 50 μg QS21 tested except * equivalent of 90 μg QS21 tested.

It was concluded that QS21 was adequately quenched in a low sodium chloride buffer.

Example 4 MPL Congeners

Chemically, 3D-MPL is a mixture of 3-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A with 4, 5 or 6 acylated chains. Each separate 3D-MPL molecule is called a congener. It is important that the congener composition remain constant, with no shift between the proportion of congeners. It is also important that any buffer used enables the congener composition to be the same as in the concentrated liposomes used to make the adjuvant compostion.

As shown on FIG. 2, the congener composition was examined in 3D-MPL concentrated liposomes (Conc. Liposomes LIP07-217, first column of FIG. 2), an adjuvant composition comprising 3D-MPL liposomes and QS21 in a 150 mM NaCl buffer (Adjuvant 150 mM NaCl, or ASA (150 mM NaCl), second column), and an adjuvant composition comprising 3D-MPL liposomes and QS21 in a sorbitol and 5 mM NaCl buffer (Adjuvant Sorbitol, or ASA (sorbitol), columns 3-7).

The congener composition was also examined in two lots of ASA (sorbitol) adjuvant at day 0 and 7 days after preparation and maintenance at 37° C. to ensure that there was no evolution over time (see final four columns of FIG. 2).

Relative distribution of tetra-, penta- and hexa-acylated congeners of MPL in concentrated liposomes or ASA (sorbitol) samples was determined by IP-HPLC-Fluo detection (ARD). Both standards and samples were derivatised with dansylhydrazine, which introduces a Fluo-active chromophore on the dissacharide backbone. The derivatised samples were analysed on a C18 reverse phase column using tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH) as an ion pair reagent. Congeners containing the same numbers of fatty acyl groups were eluted in distinct groups (tetraacyl, pentaacyl, and hexaacyl). Distribution of congeners is deduced by comparing the peak area of each group to the total peak area of all MPL congeners.

FIG. 2 shows the percent of each congener. No significant difference in congener composition was found between adjuvant buffers, and the congener composition was consistent over time in the sorbitol buffer.

Example 5 Preparation of Compositions and Used in Examples 6 and 7

5.1 Preparation of PRAME with CpG (CpG 2006 is Used in all Examples) 5.1.1 Preparation of PRAME with CpG with ASA (150 mM NaCl) used in Example 6 and Example 7 Experiment 1 and Experiment 2

30% (w/v) sucrose solution (prepared in water for injection) was added to water for injection to reach a sucrose concentration of 5%. Tris-HCl buffer 1 oomM pH 9.5 was then added to reach a 75 mM Tris buffer concentration. Borate buffer 100 mM pH 9.8 was then added to reach a 5 mM Borate buffer concentration. 10% (w/v) Poloxamer188 solution (prepared in water for injection) was then added to reach a concentration of 0.313%. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 5 minutes at RT. CpG solution at concentration of about 20 mg/ml (in water for injection) was then added to reach a concentration of 1050 μg/ml in the final formulation. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 5 minutes at RT. PRAME antigen was then added to reach a protein concentration of 1250 μg/ml. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 15 minutes at RT. The pH was checked (9.51). The mixture obtained was filled by 0.5 ml in 3 ml glass vials then freeze dried.

FIG. 3 illustrates the freeze-drying cycle used for PRAME (duration=40 h).

The resulting lyophilsation cake was reconstituted with 625 μl of aqueous adjuvant composition prepared as in Example 2 comprising 150 mM NaCl. The lyophilsation cake contained a 1.25 fold excess of antigen dose to have the right antigen/adjuvant ratio after reconstitution with a final composition of 16 mM Tris, 4 mM borate, 4% sucrose, 0.24% Poloxamer 188, 840 μg/ml CpG and 1000 μg/ml PRAME.

5.1.2 Preparation of PRAME with CpG for “Liquid Formulation” (70 Mm NaCl) in Experiment 1 of Example 7.

Concentrated Adjuvant Preparation

PBS mod 10 fold concentrated pH 6.1 when diluted 10 times was added to water for injection to reach a 1 fold concentrated buffer in the final formulation. A premixed solution made of liposomes and QS21 prediluted at 400 μg/ml was prepared separately. The premix was magnetically mixed for 15 min at room temperature. Concentrated liposomes used in the premix are made of 40 mg/ml DOPC, 10 mg/ml cholesterol and 2 mg/ml 3-deacylated MPL. The premix was added to the PBS to reach an MPL concentration of 200 μg/ml and a QS21 concentration of 200 μg/ml in the final formulation. The mixture was magnetically stirred for 15 to 30 minutes at RT, CpG at around 23 mg/ml was then added to reach a final concentration of 1680 μg/ml. The mixture was magnetically stirred for 15 to 30 minutes at RT. pH was checked so as to be 6.1+/−0.1. The AS was filtered on 0.22 μm PES filter and stored at 4° C. until use.

Final Formulation

Sucrose 25%, borate 25 mM pH9.8 and Lutrol 10% were added to WFI to reach respectively 9.25%, 5 mM and 0.24% in the final formulation. The 2 fold concentrated AS+CpG preparation was added resulting in 1 fold concentrated in the final formulation. Mixture was stirred for 5 minutes at RT. PRAME antigen in sucrose 3.15%, borate 5 mM was then added and the mixture was stirred for 5 minutes at RT.

5.1.3 Preparation of PRAME with CpG for “Liquid Formulation” in Experiment 2 of Example 7.

Concentrated Adjuvant Preparation

ASA for liquid formulation was prepared as follows. Phosphate buffer 1M (pH 6.1 when diluted 100 fold) was added under magnetic stirring to WFI to reach a 45 mM final taking into account the 50 mM phosphate concentration in the concentrated liposomes. Sorbitol 35% was then added to reach a 21.15% concentration final. Concentrated liposomes made of 40 mg/ml DOPC, 10 mg/ml cholesterol and 2 mg/ml 3-deacylated MPL were added to the mixture to reach a final MPL concentration of 450 μg/ml. QS21 bulk (at around 5000 μg/ml) was added to reach a final QS21 concentration of 450 μg/ml. The mixture is stirred for 15 minutes at RT. The pH was checked and adjusted to pH 6.1+/−0.1. Final concentration in this ASA were respectively 450 μg/ml for MPL, 450 μg/ml for QS21, 45 mM phosphate, 22.5 mM NaCl, 21.15% sorbitol.

Final Formulation

30% (w/v) sucrose solution (prepared in water for injection) was added to water for injection to reach a sucrose concentration of 4% in final formulation Tris-HCl buffer 1M pH 9.0 was then added to reach a 16 mM Tris buffer concentration in the final formulation. Borate buffer 100 mM pH 9.8 was then added to reach a 4 mM Borate buffer concentration in the final formulation. 10% (w/v) Poloxamer188 solution (prepared in water for injection) was then added to reach a concentration of 0.24% in the final formulation. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 5 minutes at RT. CpG solution at concentration of about 20 mg/ml (in water for injection) was then added to reach a concentration of 840 μg/ml in the final formulation. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 5 minutes at RT. PRAME antigen buffer (Borate 5 mM—Sucrose 3.15% pH 9.8) was then added to adjust PRAME antigen concentration at 1000 μg/ml. PRAME antigen was then added to reach a protein concentration of 8 μg/ml in the final formulation. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 15 minutes at RT. A 4.5 fold concentrated AS in sorbitol was added to reach final concentrations of 100 μg/ml MPL and QS21. The pH was checked (+/−8.0).

5.1.4 Preparation of PRAME with CpG for ASA (Sorbitol) and ASA (Sucrose) in Experiment 1 of Example 7

30% (w/v) sucrose solution (prepared in water for injection) was added to water for injection to reach a sucrose concentration of 5% in formulation, borate buffer 100 mM pH 9.8 was then added to reach a 5 mM Borate buffer concentration in this formulation, Tris-HCl buffer 100 mM pH 9.0 when 20 fold diluted was then added to reach a 5 mM Tris buffer concentration in this formulation. 10% (w/v) Poloxamer188 solution (prepared in water for injection) was then added to reach a concentration of 0.3% in the formulation. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 5 minutes at RT. CpG solution at concentration of about 20 mg/ml (in water for injection) was then added to reach a concentration of 1050 μg/ml in the formulation. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 5 minutes at RT. PRAME antigen was then added to reach a protein concentration of 1250 μg/ml in the final formulation. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 15 minutes at RT. The pH was measured to 9.4. The mixture obtained was filled by 0.5 ml in 3 ml glass vials then freeze dried.

ASA (sorbitol) was prepared as mentioned in example 1 with some slight differences: sorbitol concentration was 4.6% and QS21 was prediluted at 400 μg/ml prior to addition to the diluted concentrated liposomes.

ASA (sucrose) was prepared as mentioned in example 1 with the following differences: sorbitol is replaced by sucrose (a stock solution of 30% w/v sucrose solution is used and final sucrose concentration is 8.3%) and QS21 was prediluted at 400 μg/ml prior to addition to the diluted concentrated liposomes.

The resulting lyophilisation cake was reconstituted with 625 μl of aqueous adjuvant composition and the final composition comprised 4 mM Tris, 4 mM borate, 4% sucrose, 0.24% Poloxamer 188, 840 μg/ml CpG and 1000 μg/ml PRAME.

5.1.5 Preparation of Prame with Cpg for Asa (Sorbitol) in Experiment 2 of Example 7

30% (w/v) sucrose solution (prepared in water for injection) was added to water for injection to reach a sucrose concentration of 5% in formulation, Tris-HCl buffer 1M pH 9.0 when 50 fold diluted was then added to reach a 20 mM Tris buffer concentration in this formulation, borate buffer 100 mM pH 9.8 when 20 fold diluted was then added to reach a 5 mM Borate buffer concentration in this formulation. 10% (w/v) Poloxamer188 solution (prepared in water for injection) was then added to reach a concentration of 0.3% in the formulation. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 5 minutes at RT. CpG solution at concentration of about 20 mg/ml (in water for injection) was then added to reach a concentration of 1050 μg/ml in the formulation. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 5 minutes at RT. PRAME antigen was then added to reach a protein concentration of 1250 μg/ml in the final formulation. The mixture was magnetically stirred (150 rpm) for 15 minutes at RT. The pH was measured to 9.1. The mixture obtained was filled by 0.5 ml in 3 ml glass vials then freeze dried.

ASA sorbitol was prepared as described in Example 1. The resulting lyophilisation cake was reconstituted with 6241 of aqueous adjuvant composition and the final composition comprised 16 mM Tris, 4 mM borate, 4% sucrose, 0.24% Poloxamer 188, 840 μg/ml CpG and 1000 μg/ml PRAME.

5.2 Preparation of NY-ESO1 with CpG 5.2.1 Preparation of NY-ESO1 with CpG in Example 6.

Na/K₂ Phosphate buffer 200 mM pH 6.3 when diluted 20 times was added under magnetic stirring to water for injection to reach 12.5 mM in the final formulation. The following excipients were then added to the mixture and in the following order: monothioglycerol at 10% w/v to reach 0.3125% final, Poloxamer 188 at 5% w/v to reach 0.0625%, sucrose 25% to reach 5% final and L-Arginine base 287 mM to reach 6.25 mM. CpG bulk at around 20 mg/ml was then added to this mixture to reach a concentration of 1050 μg/ml in the final formulation. The mixture was maintained under magnetic stirring (around 150 rpm) at room temperature for 10 minutes. The pH was checked and so as to be 7.1+/−0.3. The magnetic stirring was increased to create a vortex. NY-ESO1 was then added to reach a final concentration of 750 μg/ml. The magnetic stirring was then decreased to around 150 rpm and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 minutes. An aliquot was taken to check the final pH (that has to be 7.02). The final bulk was then freeze-dried.

The resulting lyophilsation cake was reconstituted with 625 μl of ASA buffers (150 mM NaCl and sorbitol).

Example 6 Prevention of “Salting Out” in the Adjuvant Composition Comprising Sorbitol as Buffer

FIG. 4 demonstrates that reducing the salt concentration to 5 mM and including sorbitol in the adjuvant composition prevents “salting out” of both PRAME and NY-ESO-1 in immunogenic compositions (as prepared in Example 5.1.1 and 5.2.1 respectively). In FIG. 4:

1. PRAME antigen reconstituted in ASA 150 mM NaCl buffer. 2. PRAME antigen reconstituted in ASA sorbitol buffer. 3. NYESO-1 antigen reconstituted in ASA 150 mM NaCl buffer. 4. NYESO-1 antigen reconstituted in ASA sorbitol buffer.

FIG. 4 is a photographic comparison between PRAME and NYESO-1 reconstituted in ASA (150 mM NaCl) and ASA (sorbitol). As can be seen, PRAME reconstituted in ASA (150 mM NaCl) appears cloudy compared to PRAME reconstituted in ASA (sorbitol). Similarly, NY-ESO reconstituted in ASA (150 mM NaCl) appears cloudy compared to NY-ESO antigen reconstituted in ASA (sorbitol).

Example 7 In Vivo Mouse Model Experiment 1:

Seven groups of twenty female CB6F1 mice (hybrid of C57BL/6 and Balb/C mice) 6 to 8 weeks old were immunized twice intra-muscularly (every two weeks, in alternative injections in left and right gastrocnemius muscle) with the PRAME protein formulated in a fixed dose of ASA+CpG which correspond to 1/10^(th) of a human dose (50 μL containing 5 μg MPL, 5 μg QS21 and 42 μg CpG7909). 14 days after the last immunization four groups of mice (n=8 each group) were challenged subcutaneously with 10e5 CT26-PRAME tumor cells, as described below. The seven groups of mice were:

-   -   grp1: buffer     -   grp2: colyophilised PRAME+CpG resuspended in the “classical” ASA         (150 mM NaCl) in which the PRAME protein precipitates     -   grp3: colyo PRAME+CpG resuspended in ASA (sucrose)     -   grp4: colyo PRAME+CpG resuspended in ASA (sucrose—incubation 48         h at 25° c.)     -   grp5: colyo PRAME+CpG resuspended in ASA (sorbitol)     -   grp6: PRAME+ASA—“liquid” formulation containing 70 mM NaCl+CpG     -   grp7: PRAME+ASA—“liquid” formulation containing 70 mM NaCl+CpG         (+poloxamer)

7 days after the last immunization, the cellular response by the ability of T-cell to secrete cytokines (n=4 groups of 3 mice) was analyzed.

All the mice received 0.4 μg of PRAME in 1/10th of Human dose of ASA+CpG Adjuvant System (5 μg of MPL, 5 μg of QS21 and 42 μg of CpG).

Results: Tumor Growth

Mean tumor growth over time, as measured by surface (mm²) (+SD), per group is represented in FIG. 6. The PRAME formulated ASA (150 mM NaCl)+CpG and PRAME in the ASA liquid formulation induce a lower tumor protection (greater tumor growth) than the PRAME ASA (sorbitol)+CpG.

Cellular Response (7 Days Post 2 Immunizations—n=4 Groups of 3 Mice Per Group Treatment):

The frequency of CD4 and CD8 T-cells able to produce cytokines like IFNγ and TNFα after immunization of mice with the PRAME ASA-CpG tumour antigen is used to reflect the capacity of the different formulations to induce a functional cellular response. 7 days after the second immunization, the percentages of CD4 and CD8 T-cells producing cytokines (IFNγ and TNFα) were measured by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) on spleen cells of immunized mice.

The % of CD4 producing IFNγ and TNFα (average+/−standard deviation) are shown in FIG. 5.

No measurable CD8 response was found in this experiment.

The PRAME protein formulated in ASA (150 mM NaCl)+CpG was shown to precipitate and induces a lower specific T-cell response compared to PRAME formulated in ASA (sorbitol)+CpG. A similarly good PRAME specific CD4 response was obtained when the PRAME protein was formulated in ASA (sorbitol)+CpG and in the ASA “liquid” formulation (70 mM NaCl)+CpG (no statistical difference). The humoral immune response was also tested but the data after 2 injections were not interpretable.

Experiment 2:

Four groups of twenty-four female CB6F1 mice (hybrid of C57BL/6 and Balb/C mice) 6 to 8 weeks old were immunized four times intra-muscularly (every two weeks, in alternative injections in left and right gastrocnemius muscle) with the PRAME protein formulated in a fixed dose of ASA+CpG which correspond to 1/10^(th) of a human dose (50 μL containing 5 μg MPL, 5 μg QS21 and 42 μg CpG7909). 14 days after the last immunization four groups of mice (n=12 each group) were challenged subcutaneously with 10e5 CT26-PRAME tumor cells, as described below. The four groups of mice were:

-   -   grp1: buffer     -   grp2: colyophilised PRAME+CpG resuspended in the “classical” ASA         (150 mM NaCl) in which the PRAME protein precipitates     -   grp3: colyo PRAME+CpG resuspended in ASA (sorbitol)     -   grp4: PRAME+ASA—“liquid” formulation+CpG (+poloxamer)

14 days after the last immunization, the immune response was analyzed using different read outs as follows:

-   -   Humoral response (n=12)     -   Cellular response by the ability of T-cell to secrete cytokines         (n=4 groups of 3 mice)     -   Protective effect against a tumor challenge (n=12)

All the mice received 0.4 μg of PRAME in 1/10th of Hu dose of ASA+CpG Adjuvant System (5 μg of MPL, 5 μg of QS21 and 42 μg of CpG).

Results: Tumor Growth

Mean tumor growth over time, as measured by surface (mm²) (+SD), per group is represented in FIG. 9. The PRAME formulated ASA (150 mM NaCl)+CpG induces a lower tumor protection (greater tumor growth) than the PRAME ASA (sorbitol)+CpG. Similar protection was observed for PRAME ASA (sorbitol)+CpG and PRAME in the ASA liquid formulation+CpG).

Sample Analysis: Humoral Response:

Mice sera (n=12) were tested by ELISA for the presence of PRAME-specific antibodies 14 days after the last of the 4 immunizations, as described below. The antibody response (total Ig) was assessed by ELISA using the purified recombinant PRAME protein as coating antigen. Sera from immunized animals were analyzed for the presence of PRAME specific antibodies. The geometric mean of the Standard titers (n=12 mice)+/−95% confidence intervals obtained after the 4 immunizations are shown in the FIG. 7. The PRAME/ASA+CpG containing the classical ASA (150 mM NaCl) induces a very small antibody response while the PRAME/ASA+CpG containing ASA (sorbitol) induces very high antibody titers. This response is similar to that induced by the liquid formulation ASA.

Cellular Response (14 Days Post 4Th Immunizations—n=4 Groups of 3 Mice Per Group Treatment):

The frequency of CD4 and CD8 T-cells able to produce cytokines like IFNγ and TNFα after immunization of mice with the PRAME ASA-CpG tumour antigen is used to reflect the capacity of the different formulations to induce a functional cellular response. 14 days after the fourth immunization, the percentages of CD4 and CD8 T-cells producing cytokines (IFNγ and TNFα) were measured by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) on spleen cells of immunized mice.

The % of CD4 producing IFNγ and TNFα (average+/−standard deviation) are shown in FIG. 8. p-values are largely inferior to 0.05 demonstrating a significant difference between the group 2 and the groups 3 and 4.

No measurable CD8 response was found in this experiment.

The PRAME protein formulated in ASA (150 mM NaCl)+CpG was shown to precipitate and induces a statistically lower specific T-cell response compared to PRAME formulated in ASA (sorbitol)+CpG.

In contrast a similarly good PRAME specific CD4 response was obtained when the PRAME protein was formulated in ASA (sorbitol)+CpG, and in the ASA “liquid” formulation+CpG.

Method CT26-PRAME Tumor Model and Tumor Growth

The CT26-PRAME cell line was generated by transfecting the CT26 colon carcinoma cell line with the mammalian expression plasmid, pcDNA3, encoding the cDNA for PRAME (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). Selection with G418 (200 μg/ml) and limit-dilution cloning yielded a clone expressing PRAME (CT26-PRAME) as determined by quantitative real-time PCR (10e-3 PRAME mRNA copies/copy of mouse pectin which is in the range of the level of PRAME expression by human tumors)

CT26 PRAME cells were grown in vitro at 37° C. with 5% CO₂ in RPMI Medium with 10% fetal calf serum, 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin-steptomycin, 1% non-essential amino acids, 1% sodium pyruvate and 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol. Cells were trypsinised, washed twice in serum-free medium and injected in 200 μl RPMI Medium subcutaneously in the right flank of four groups of CB6F1 mice 14 days after the last immunization with PRAME as described above. Individual tumor growth was measured twice a week. The product of the 2 main diameters of each tumor was recorded overtime and the data are shown as the mean tumor surface (mm²) in each group of animals.

Sample Analysis: Humoral Response

Before addition of sera the immunoplate was coated with the PRAME antigen overnight at 4° C. After reaction with the sera for 90 mins at 37° C., a biotinylated rabbit whole antibody against mouse immunoglobulins was added for 90 mins at 37° C. The antigen-antibody complex was revealed by incubation with a streptavidin-biotinylated peroxydase complex for 30 mins at 37° C. This complex was then revealed by the addition of tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) for 10 mins at Room Temperature and the reaction was stopped with 0.2 M H₂SO₄. Optical densities were recorded at 450 nm.

Sample Analysis Method: Cellular Response (IFNg/TNFa Production)

The IFNg and TNFa production by CD4 and CD8 T-cells was measured by flow cytometry (LSR2 from Becton Dickinson) using intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) on spleen cells of immunized mice (4 groups of 3 mice per group) after 2 hrs stimulation with a pool of overlapping 15mer peptides covering the entire PRAME protein sequence.

Stimulation of T Cells:

-   -   Spleen cells of immunized animals were re-stimulated with a pool         of 123 15mer peptides overlapping by 11 amino acids, covering         the entire sequence of PRAME. The peptides (1 μg/ml/peptide) are         mixed with 10e6 T cells (spleen cells) 2 hrs at 37° c. in a 96         well plate (U) in a final volume of 200 μl of RPMI 5% FCS         containing 2 μg/ml of anti CD49d and anti CD28 at 2 μg/ml     -   after the incubation, 50 μl of brefeldin (1/1000) was added in         RPMI 5% FCS

Intracellular Staining:

CD4/CD8 Staining:

-   -   Cells were transferred in a 96 well plate (conic wells)     -   Centrifugation 1000 rpm 5′ at 4° c.     -   Wash with 250 μl FACS buffer (PBS1% FCS)         -   Pellets of cells were incubated with 50 μl of 2.4G2 1/50 in             FACS buffer during 10′ at 4° c.         -   50 μl of Master mix CD4-PE (dilution Mab: 1/200) and             CD8PerCP (dilution Mab: 1/200) in FACS buffer were added             during 30′ at 4° c.         -   Wash in FACS buffer (1200 RPM-10′)

Permeabilisation of Cells:

-   -   Pellets were incubated with 200 μl of cytoFix-cytoPerm solution         during 20′ at 4° c.     -   Washed with permWASH 1× (1200 RPM-10′)—the permWASH solution is         10× concentrated, dilution in sterile water

I IFNγ and TNFα Intracellular Staining:

-   -   pellets were incubated 2 hrs at 4° c. with 50 μl of Mix IFNγ APC         (dilution Mab: 1/50) and     -   TNFα FITC (dilution Mab: 1/50) in the permWASH1× solution     -   Washed with permWASH 1× (1200 RPM-10′)     -   pellets were resuspended in FACS buffer     -   FACS analysis

Brefeldin (Gologi Plug): BD cat. 555029

Cytofix/cytoperm: Pharmingen (BD) Cat n^(o) 554722 Perm/wash buffer: Pharmingen (BD) Cat n^(o) 554723 Rat anti Mouse CD49d purified NA LE: BD Cat n^(o) 553154 Rat anti Mouse CD28 purified NA LE: BD Cat n^(o) 553295 Rat anti Mouse CD8a perCp: BD Cat n^(o) 553036 Rat anti Mouse CD4 PE: BD Cat n^(o) 556616 Rat anti Mouse IFNγ APC: BD Cat n^(o) 554413 Rat anti Mouse TNFα FITC: BD Cat n^(o) 554418 Anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (2.4G2) Becton Dickinson cat n^(o) 553142 (0.5 mg/ml) 

1. An immunogenic composition comprising an antigen, wherein the concentration of sodium chloride is less than 100 mM and wherein the antigen is selected from the group consisting of (a) PRAME or a fragment or derivative thereof and (b) NY-ESO-1 or a fragment or derivative thereof. 2-8. (canceled)
 9. The immunogenic composition according to claim 1 further comprising a non-ionic isotonicity agent. 10-13. (canceled)
 14. The immunogenic composition according to claim 9 comprising about 5 mM sodium chloride and between 5% and 6% w/v sorbitol.
 15. The immunogenic composition of claim 1 comprising one or more immunostimulants.
 16. The immunogenic composition of claim 15 wherein the immunostimulant is a saponin, a TLR-4 agonist, or a mixture thereof.
 17. The immunogenic composition of claim 16 wherein the immunostimulant is in the form of liposomes.
 18. The immunogenic composition of claim 16 wherein the saponin is QuilA or a derivative thereof.
 19. The immunogenic composition of claim 18 wherein the derivative of QuilA is QS21.
 20. The immunogenic composition of claim 16 wherein the TLR-4 agonist is 3D-MPL.
 21. An immunogenic according to claim 16 further comprising a CpG oligonucleotide. 22-24. (canceled)
 25. A process for making the immunogenic composition of claim 1 comprising the steps: (a) lyophilising an antigen with an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide; and (b) reconstituting the lyophilised composition of step La) with an aqueous adjuvant composition comprising a TLR-4 agonist, and a saponin in a liposomal formulation and a non-ionic isotonicity agent comprising sorbitol, wherein the concentration of NaCl is less than 100 mM.
 26. A kit comprising: (a) lyophilised antigen, optionally co-lyophilised with CpG; and (b) aqueous adjuvant comprising a TLR-4 agonist, and a saponin in a liposomal formulation and a non-ionic isotonicity agent comprising sorbitol, wherein the concentration of NaCl is less than 100 mM. 27-34. (canceled) 